Nobody Realizes There Is a Problem Until Someone Has to Make a Decision
For most families, the problems associated with dying without a Will do not become apparent on the day someone dies. The problems begin several days or weeks later when practical decisions have to be made, and family members discover that nobody has clear authority to make them.
Robert had lived in St. Charles County for more than forty years. He owned the home where he raised his children, maintained several bank accounts, had a modest investment portfolio, and kept most of his important records in a filing cabinet located in the basement. Following the death of his wife several years earlier, Robert frequently discussed what he wanted to happen when he eventually passed away. He repeatedly told his three adult children that everything should be divided equally. The family understood his wishes, and nobody expected problems.
When Robert died unexpectedly, his children focused on the same things most families focus on. Funeral arrangements had to be made. Relatives needed to be notified. Friends stopped by the house. Meals appeared from neighbors. During those first few days, nobody was thinking about probate.
The first indication that something might be more complicated than expected occurred when Robert’s oldest daughter attempted to obtain information regarding one of his bank accounts. She had helped her father pay bills for years. She knew where he banked. She knew approximately how much money he had. She assumed obtaining information would be straightforward. Instead, the bank informed her that they could not discuss the account. At first she believed there had been some misunderstanding. After all, she was Robert’s daughter. She was trying to help settle his affairs. Surely there was a simple way to gain access to the information. There wasn’t.
Over the next several weeks, similar issues continued to arise. Utility companies needed to be contacted. Insurance information was needed. Property tax statements had to be located. Questions arose regarding maintenance of the house. The lawn still needed to be cut. Bills still arrived in the mailbox. Life did not stop simply because Robert had died. The children quickly discovered that knowing what their father wanted and having legal authority to act on his estate’s behalf were entirely different things.
The situation became more complicated when the discussion turned to the house. One child believed the property should be sold as quickly as possible. Another believed the family should take more time before making a decision. The third wanted to explore keeping the property as a rental investment. None of these positions were unreasonable. However, each required someone to have authority to act. That was when the family encountered the issue that often drives intestate probate administrations. Nobody was in charge.
Had Robert signed a Will, he could have nominated the person he wanted to administer his estate. He could have identified the individual he trusted to gather assets, pay bills, communicate with financial institutions, and ultimately distribute property to beneficiaries. Instead, the family found itself attempting to determine who should fill that role after Robert was already gone.
Missouri law provides a mechanism for resolving that issue, but the process requires court involvement. Before someone can begin acting on behalf of an intestate estate, probate generally must be opened, and a Personal Representative appointed. Until that occurs, family members often find themselves stuck between responsibilities they know must be addressed and a lack of legal authority to do so.
For many Missouri families, this is the moment when they first appreciate the practical value of a Will. The document is not simply a list of who receives property. It is also a roadmap that identifies who is responsible for carrying out the administrative process. When that roadmap does not exist, the family must spend time and resources determining answers that could have been resolved years earlier with proper planning.
The Court Does Not Ask What Dad Wanted
One of the most difficult realities for families to accept is that the probate court generally does not spend much time determining what the deceased intended to do with their property. Families are often surprised by this because they enter the process believing that everyone knows what Mom or Dad wanted and that those wishes should naturally control what happens next. Unfortunately, probate courts do not operate on assumptions, family recollections, or verbal instructions. They operate on legal documents and, in the absence of such documents, Missouri law.
After Robert’s children realized probate would be necessary, discussions quickly turned toward how the estate should ultimately be divided. Initially, everyone believed there would be little disagreement because Robert had talked about his wishes for years. He wanted everything divided equally among his three children. He had said it repeatedly at holidays, family gatherings, and birthday celebrations. No one questioned that those conversations had occurred. The problem was that none of those conversations had been reduced to a legally enforceable document.
As the probate process moved forward, one of the children discovered something else Robert had said years earlier. At one point, he had expressed a desire for his granddaughter to receive a portion of his investment account to help pay for college. Another family member remembered Robert discussing the possibility of leaving his truck to a nephew who had helped maintain the property. Still another relative recalled conversations about keeping certain family heirlooms together rather than dividing them among multiple beneficiaries. None of these recollections were necessarily inaccurate. The problem was that they did not all match.
As often happens after a death, different people remembered different conversations. Some discussions may have occurred years earlier. Others may have reflected wishes that changed over time. Some may have been serious plans while others were simply thoughts expressed during casual conversations. Without a Will, there was no reliable way to determine which of those conversations reflected Robert’s final intentions.
This is precisely why Missouri law has intestate succession statutes. Rather than attempting to reconstruct a person’s wishes through conflicting memories and family testimony, the law applies a predetermined set of inheritance rules. Those rules may not perfectly match what the deceased person wanted, but they provide certainty and allow the estate administration process to move forward.
People often assume the biggest risk is that the government will take their property. In reality, that is rarely the concern. The more common issue is that assets pass under Missouri’s plan rather than the deceased’s plan.
Imagine a father who wants one child to inherit the family business because that child has worked in it for 20 years. Imagine a mother who wants a larger share of her estate to pass to a disabled child who will need additional financial support. Imagine grandparents who want educational funds established for grandchildren before other distributions occur. Those objectives are entirely reasonable. However, they generally require planning and documentation. If no Will exists, Missouri law is not going to create those customized outcomes simply because family members believe they reflect what the deceased person probably wanted.
The court’s responsibility is not to determine the fairest result. The court’s responsibility is to apply Missouri law. That distinction becomes especially important when surviving spouses and children are involved because the distribution rules often produce results families do not anticipate. Many people assume that if they are married, everything automatically passes to their spouse. In some situations, that may effectively occur. In others, particularly when children from prior relationships are involved, the outcome can be dramatically different from what the family expected. Those situations are often where the most significant surprises occur.
When a Surviving Spouse Discovers the Estate Is Not Passing the Way They Expected
One of the most common misconceptions in estate planning is the belief that marriage automatically solves inheritance issues. Many couples spend decades building a life together and naturally assume that when one spouse dies, everything simply passes to the surviving spouse. In some situations that assumption is largely correct. In others, it can be dangerously wrong. The distinction often comes down to whether there are children from a prior relationship.
Consider the case of Tom and Linda. They have been married for fifteen years and live in a home in St. Charles County valued at approximately $450,000. Tom has two adult children from his first marriage. Linda has one child from a prior relationship. Most of the family’s assets were accumulated during Tom and Linda’s marriage, and they have always viewed everything as belonging to the household rather than to one individual. Tom frequently tells Linda not to worry because she will be taken care of if something happens to him. He intends for her to remain in the home, continue using the family’s savings, and make decisions regarding the property without interference. Unfortunately, Tom never signs a Will.
When Tom dies unexpectedly, Linda assumes she will simply continue managing everything as she always has. Instead, she discovers that Missouri’s intestate succession laws are now controlling the outcome. The law is not concerned with what Tom intended to do. The law is concerned with applying a predetermined formula.
The issue is not necessarily that the surviving spouse receives nothing. In fact, surviving spouses often receive a substantial share of the estate. The issue is that the law may create ownership interests in other family members that the deceased spouse never intended. Assets that the surviving spouse assumed would be under their sole control may suddenly involve children, stepchildren, or other heirs whose interests must also be considered.
The family home is often the primary source of concern. Many surviving spouses are shocked to learn that inheriting an interest in property and having complete control over property are not the same thing. If ownership interests become divided among multiple beneficiaries, decisions involving the property can become significantly more complicated. Questions arise regarding whether the property should be sold, maintained, refinanced, improved, or retained for future generations.
These issues become even more emotionally charged when adult children and a surviving spouse have different objectives. The children may view the property as part of their inheritance. The surviving spouse may view it as the home where they intend to spend the rest of their life. Neither perspective is necessarily unreasonable, but the absence of a Will means the family is now relying on Missouri law to resolve a situation that could have been addressed through planning.
The financial impact can be equally significant. Investment accounts, savings, personal property, and other assets may become subject to inheritance rules that do not reflect the family’s expectations. The surviving spouse who assumed everything would pass seamlessly may discover that the administration process is more complex, more expensive, and more time-consuming than anticipated. Ironically, these situations often arise in loving families. There may be no hostility between the surviving spouse and the children. Everyone may genuinely want to do what the deceased person would have wanted. The problem is that once probate begins, good intentions do not create legal authority. Family members must navigate a system that follows statutory rules rather than family understandings.
This reality becomes particularly apparent in blended families. A second marriage may have lasted twenty years. The surviving spouse may have helped raise the deceased spouse’s children. The family may have celebrated holidays together for decades. Yet when no Will exists, those relationships do not necessarily determine how assets pass. Missouri law determines the outcome, and the result may differ substantially from what the deceased person believed would happen. Under these circumstances, families realize that dying without a Will is not simply an administrative inconvenience. It is a decision to allow the state to write an estate plan after death. Whether that plan reflects the deceased person’s wishes is largely a matter of chance.
The House Is Where Family Disagreements Become Real
Many probate disputes begin with good intentions and end with frustration because of a single asset: the family home.
Bank accounts can be divided. Investment accounts can be liquidated. Vehicles can be sold. Personal property can be distributed. A house is different. It is often the most valuable asset in the estate, but also the one with the greatest emotional significance. Family memories are tied to the property. Holidays were celebrated there. Children grew up there. Grandchildren visited there. As a result, decisions involving the house are rarely viewed as simple financial transactions.
Imagine that David dies without a Will. He leaves behind his wife, Susan, and two adult children from a prior marriage. The family home is worth approximately $500,000 and has been paid off for years. Susan has lived in the residence for nearly twenty years and expects to remain there indefinitely. The children have good relationships with Susan and initially assure her that they want what is best for everyone. At first, there appears to be no conflict.
Several months later, practical issues begin to emerge. The roof needs replacement. Property taxes are due. Homeowner’s insurance premiums increase. The furnace reaches the end of its useful life. Questions arise regarding who should pay for these expenses and whether improvements make sense if the property may eventually be sold. One child believes the house should be sold immediately so everyone can receive their share of the inheritance. Another believes the property should be retained because real estate values are increasing. Susan wants to continue living in the home and sees no reason to sell. Each position has merit. Each person believes they are acting reasonably. Yet the absence of a Will means there is no written guidance from David explaining what he wanted to happen.
As the months pass, disagreements that once seemed minor become increasingly important. If the house appreciates by $50,000, who benefits from that increase? If substantial repairs are required, who bears the cost? If Susan continues living in the property, should she be responsible for all expenses? What happens if she wants to refinance? What happens if one of the children experiences financial difficulties and wants immediate access to inheritance funds? These questions often have legal answers, but they rarely have simple answers.
The situation becomes even more complicated when personal property remains in the home. Family photographs, jewelry, furniture, tools, collections, and keepsakes often carry emotional value that exceeds their financial value. One child may want the dining room table where family holidays were celebrated. Another may want the same table because it belonged to a grandparent. A surviving spouse may assume certain items should remain in the residence. Without written instructions, every decision becomes a potential source of disagreement.
The unfortunate reality is that these disputes frequently occur in families that genuinely care about one another. The conflict is not necessarily driven by greed. It is often driven by uncertainty. Family members are attempting to determine what is fair while simultaneously navigating grief, financial concerns, and legal obligations. The deceased person’s voice, which could have resolved many of these issues through proper planning, is no longer available.
This is one of the reasons estate planning attorneys spend so much time discussing residences with clients. People frequently focus on bank accounts and investments because those assets are easy to measure. The family home is different. It is both a financial asset and an emotional asset. Decisions involving the property often affect where someone lives, how family memories are preserved, and how beneficiaries perceive fairness. When a Will is absent, those decisions become substantially more difficult.
By the time many families reach this stage of probate, they begin to understand that dying without a Will is not simply about who receives property. It is about who must make difficult decisions after death and whether those decisions will be guided by clear instructions or by competing interpretations of what the deceased person probably wanted. The larger the estate and the more complicated the family relationships become, the more likely those competing interpretations are to create problems.
Blended Families Are Where the Absence of a Will Causes the Biggest Surprises
If there is one situation where dying without a Will routinely creates outcomes families never expected, it is the blended family. Many people enter a second marriage believing they have already solved the inheritance problem. They have updated beneficiary designations on life insurance. They have added a spouse to certain accounts. They have discussed their wishes with their children. Because everyone gets along, they assume the family will work things out when the time comes. Unfortunately, probate does not operate on assumptions. It operates on legal documents and Missouri law.
Consider the situation of Mark and Jennifer. Mark has two children from his first marriage. Jennifer has one child from a prior relationship. They have been married for nearly twenty years and own a home in St. Charles County worth approximately $600,000. Mark also owns investment accounts totaling roughly $750,000 and several pieces of recreational property that have appreciated substantially over the years.
When friends ask about his estate plan, Mark often gives the same answer. Everything will eventually go to Jennifer, and when she passes away, whatever remains will go to the children. In Mark’s mind, the plan is simple. Jennifer should be protected first, and the children should inherit later. The problem is that Mark never signs a Will.
When he dies unexpectedly, everyone initially gets along. Jennifer is grieving. The children are supportive. Nobody is talking about inheritance. Nobody is thinking about litigation. Everyone believes they know what Mark wanted. Then practical questions begin to arise.
Jennifer wants to sell one of the recreational properties because it requires maintenance and taxes that she no longer wants to manage. One of Mark’s children believes the property should remain in the family because it had been used for hunting trips for decades. Another believes it should be sold immediately before market conditions change. At the same time, questions arise regarding the investment accounts. Jennifer assumes she should have complete control over the assets because she is the surviving spouse. The children believe their father’s assets should eventually pass to them because that is what he always discussed.
The conflict is not created by bad people. It is created by uncertainty. Everyone is trying to honor Mark’s wishes. The problem is that nobody can point to a document establishing what those wishes actually were.
As probate continues, another concern emerges. Jennifer is relatively healthy and could easily live another twenty years. If she spends the investment accounts for her own support, remarries, changes beneficiary designations, or experiences financial difficulties, the children may ultimately inherit far less than Mark envisioned. Conversely, if significant portions of the estate pass directly to the children, Jennifer may have less financial security than Mark intended for her.
This is exactly the type of problem that estate planning documents are designed to address. A properly drafted plan can balance the interests of a surviving spouse and children from a prior relationship. It can provide financial security for the spouse while preserving an inheritance for children. It can identify who should control assets and under what circumstances distributions should occur. Without those documents, the family is left relying on Missouri’s default rules.
The emotional dynamics often make the situation even more difficult. A second marriage that has lasted twenty years may feel no different than a first marriage to the surviving spouse. The children may genuinely care about their stepparent and still feel strongly that certain assets should remain within their side of the family. The surviving spouse may believe promises were made during the marriage regarding financial security and long-term support. Both perspectives can be understandable. Both perspectives can be sincere. Unfortunately, sincerity does not eliminate uncertainty.
What began as a loving family can gradually divide into separate groups with competing interests. Family gatherings become uncomfortable. Communication decreases. Decisions that once could have been handled through simple conversations now require attorneys, court filings, and negotiations. The tragedy is that many of these disputes are entirely avoidable. They are not caused by greed. They are not caused by family dysfunction. They are caused by the absence of clear instructions from the one person who could have prevented the disagreement.
For families reading this article, the lesson is not that blended families are destined for conflict. The lesson is that blended families often require more planning, not less. The more complicated the family structure becomes, the more important it is to clearly document intentions before a crisis occurs.
What Happens If There Is No Spouse and No Children?
People often assume Missouri’s inheritance laws become simpler when someone dies unmarried and without children. In some respects that is true. In practice, however, these estates often create an entirely different set of challenges because family members may have very different expectations regarding who should inherit and who should control the administration process.
Consider the case of Carol, a seventy-two-year-old retiree who never married and had no children. She owned a home worth approximately $350,000, maintained several investment accounts, and accumulated personal property over her lifetime, including jewelry, family heirlooms, antiques, and collections. Carol always intended to create a Will but never got around to it. Like many people, she assumed there would be plenty of time.
After her death, family members quickly began discussing what Carol would have wanted. A niece believed the residence should remain in the family because Carol had frequently discussed her attachment to the home. A nephew believed the house should be sold and the proceeds divided. Other relatives remembered conversations regarding specific personal property that Carol supposedly intended for particular family members. The problem was familiar. Everyone believed they knew what Carol wanted. Nobody could prove it.
Without a Will, Missouri law determines who inherits. The law follows a statutory order rather than a family’s recollection of conversations that occurred over many years. As a result, relatives who assumed they would inherit may discover they have no inheritance rights at all, while other relatives who had little involvement in the deceased person’s life may unexpectedly become beneficiaries.
This often creates surprise because people tend to confuse relationships with legal rights. A person may have been the primary caregiver for an aging aunt for years. A nephew may have handled repairs, transportation, and countless errands. A niece may have visited weekly and assisted with medical appointments. While those contributions may have been deeply appreciated, they do not automatically determine inheritance rights under Missouri law.
The issue becomes even more complicated when family members are scattered across multiple states. One relative may believe they should serve as Personal Representative because they live nearby and can handle practical matters. Another may believe they should serve because they have a stronger financial background. Still another may feel entitled to participate in every decision because of their relationship with the deceased. Without a Will identifying a preferred Personal Representative, those disagreements can delay the administration process before it even begins.
Personal property frequently creates more conflict than families expect. Financial accounts can usually be divided, but family heirlooms are different. There may be only one wedding ring, one photo album, or one piece of furniture with decades of family history attached to it. When multiple relatives want the same item, determining a fair outcome can become surprisingly difficult.
These situations demonstrate that dying without a Will is not solely a problem for married couples or parents. Individuals often have a greater need for planning because there is no obvious person to step forward and make decisions. The law will still provide answers, but those answers may bear little resemblance to the plan the deceased person would have created if given the opportunity.
Regardless of whether the heirs are a surviving spouse, children, parents, siblings, nieces, nephews, or more distant relatives, one reality remains the same. The absence of a Will does not eliminate the probate process. In fact, it often makes probate more important because the court must determine not only how the estate should be administered but also who has authority to receive and distribute the assets.
Many Families Are Surprised to Learn Probate Still Happens
One of the most common misconceptions about intestate estates is the belief that the absence of a Will somehow avoids probate. When a person dies without a Will, probate frequently becomes even more important because the court must determine who has authority to act and ensure that Missouri’s inheritance laws are followed.
Returning to Robert’s family, the absence of a Will did not eliminate the need for probate. Instead, it created additional questions that had to be resolved through the probate process. Before assets could be distributed, a Personal Representative needed to be appointed. Financial accounts had to be identified and collected. Debts and expenses had to be addressed. Creditors had to be given an opportunity to present valid claims. Only after those steps were completed could the remaining assets be distributed to the appropriate heirs.
Many families are surprised by the amount of work involved. The probate process is not simply a matter of filing paperwork and dividing assets. Someone must gather information, communicate with financial institutions, maintain property, prepare inventories, and comply with court requirements. The absence of a Will does not eliminate those responsibilities. In many situations, it increases them.
This is one reason why families often discover that the real issue is not whether someone left a Will. The real issue is whether they left clear instructions. A properly drafted estate plan can simplify administration, identify decision makers, and reduce uncertainty. When those instructions are missing, the probate process often becomes longer, more expensive, and more stressful for the people left behind.
For families facing the loss of a loved one, understanding that probate may still be necessary is important. The process exists to provide a legal framework for transferring assets and resolving outstanding issues. While probate is often manageable, it is generally easier when decisions are made before death rather than after.
The Real Cost of Dying Without a Will Is Not Measured in Dollars
When families discuss the consequences of dying without a Will, the conversation often focuses on legal fees, court costs, and probate expenses. While those costs certainly matter, they are rarely the most significant loss created by the absence of an estate plan. The real cost is the loss of control.
Robert spent decades building his estate. He worked to pay off his home. He accumulated savings. He maintained relationships with his children and grandchildren. Like most people, he had opinions regarding who should receive certain assets, who could be trusted to make decisions, and how his family should be cared for after his death. Unfortunately, none of those opinions were documented.
As a result, decisions that could have been made by Robert during his lifetime were left to Missouri law after his death. The court determined who would administer the estate. Statutory inheritance rules determined who would receive assets. Family members were left trying to interpret conversations from years earlier while simultaneously navigating the probate process.
Most people would never willingly allow strangers to make major financial decisions for them while they are alive. Yet when someone dies without a Will, default legal rules often make the most important decisions after death.
For some families, the outcome may closely resemble what the deceased person would have wanted. For others, the result can be dramatically different. A surviving spouse may receive less control than expected. Children may inherit assets sooner than intended. Family heirlooms may end up with beneficiaries the deceased person never would have selected. Relationships that took decades to build can become strained by disagreements that could have been prevented through a few signed documents.
Perhaps most importantly, surviving family members inherit uncertainty at a time when they are already dealing with grief. Instead of focusing on healing and supporting one another, they may find themselves attempting to answer questions that the deceased person was in the best position to answer.
A Will cannot eliminate every challenge that arises after death. Probate may still be necessary. Assets still need to be gathered. Debts still need to be addressed. However, a properly drafted estate plan allows the individual creating it to make important decisions rather than leaving those decisions to statutory formulas and family speculation. That ability to maintain control over what happens after death is often the most valuable benefit a Will provides.
Families dealing with an intestate estate often need help answering two separate questions. The first is what Missouri law says must happen now. The second is how to prevent the same uncertainty from affecting their own spouses, children, or beneficiaries in the future. Those are different issues, but they are closely connected. Probate administration addresses the immediate problem. Estate planning helps prevent the next one.
Conclusion
Most people who die without a Will do not do so intentionally. They simply assume there will be more time. Some believe their family already knows what they want. Others assume everything will automatically pass to a spouse or children without difficulty. Unfortunately, families often discover after a death that understanding a loved one’s wishes and legally carrying out those wishes are two very different things.
Missouri law provides a plan for people who die without a Will. That plan determines who inherits, who may administer the estate, and how assets ultimately pass to beneficiaries. While the law provides answers, those answers do not always align with what the deceased would have chosen. The more complicated the family situation becomes, the more likely Missouri’s default rules are to produce unexpected results.
For some families, the consequences are relatively minor. For others, they can affect who controls the estate, who inherits valuable assets, whether the family home must be sold, and how relationships among surviving family members evolve in the months and years following a death. The important lesson is that many of these issues are preventable. A properly drafted estate plan allows individuals to choose who will administer their estate, determine who will inherit their assets, and provide clear instructions that reduce uncertainty for the people they leave behind.
If a loved one has already passed away without a Will, understanding Missouri probate law is an important first step. If you are planning for your own future, creating a Will before a crisis occurs can provide clarity, control, and peace of mind for the people who matter most.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does it mean to die intestate in Missouri?
A person dies intestate when they die without a valid Will. In those situations, Missouri law determines who inherits the deceased person’s assets and who may have priority to serve as the Personal Representative of the estate. Instead of following the deceased person’s written instructions, the probate court follows Missouri’s intestate succession laws.
Does everything automatically go to my spouse if I die without a Will in Missouri?
Not necessarily. Many people assume a surviving spouse automatically inherits everything, but the answer depends on the specific family circumstances. The existence of children, particularly children from prior relationships, can significantly affect how assets pass. This is one reason estate planning is especially important for married couples in second marriages or blended families.
Can a child serve as Personal Representative if there is no Will?
Yes. Missouri law allows certain individuals to seek appointment as Personal Representative when a person dies without a Will. However, the appointment is not automatic. If multiple family members want to serve, disagreements can arise regarding who should administer the estate. The probate court ultimately has authority to approve the appointment.
What happens if family members disagree about who should inherit?
When a person dies without a Will, inheritance rights are generally determined by Missouri law rather than family agreements or verbal understandings. While disputes can still arise regarding assets, administration, or interpretation of family circumstances, the probate court applies Missouri’s intestate succession statutes to determine who the legal heirs are.
Do I still have to go through probate if there is no Will?
In many situations, yes. The absence of a Will does not eliminate the probate process. In fact, probate often becomes more important because the court must determine who has authority to act on behalf of the estate and ensure that assets are distributed in accordance with Missouri law. Whether probate is required depends on the nature and ownership of the assets involved.
Can a verbal promise replace a Will?
Generally, no. Family members frequently remember conversations regarding what a loved one wanted to happen after death. While those conversations may accurately reflect the deceased person’s intentions, verbal statements typically do not replace a properly executed Will. Probate courts generally rely on legal documents and Missouri law rather than on competing recollections of conversations that occurred during the deceased’s lifetime.
About Jones Elder Law
Jones Elder Law helps Missouri families navigate probate administration, estate settlement, estate planning, Medicaid planning, and long-term care asset protection. The firm works with Personal Representatives, Trustees, surviving spouses, and beneficiaries throughout St. Charles County, St. Louis County, and surrounding Missouri communities.
Important: This article is provided for general educational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. Probate administration, estate planning, and estate settlement issues depend upon the specific facts of each situation. Reading this article does not create an attorney-client relationship. Individuals facing probate or estate administration questions should consult with a qualified Missouri probate attorney regarding their specific circumstances.
The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and
should not be based solely upon advertisements.
